Steaming cup of common sense

Our proactive initiative is to inject a little thoughtfulness into our understanding of culture, politics, and the world around us. This blog will contain a mix of everyday observations, broad sweeping generalities, and everything in between. Grab your doughnut, pull up a chair, and sit down with your steaming cup of common sense. (That is until doughnuts are taxed too heavily and we become convinced that subjective morality negates the notion of 'common' sense.)

Friday, August 25, 2006

Between a Rock and Minimum Wage

I happen to be on this mailing list for Congress.org (always intriguing to see the lack of work those people can get away with and still give themselves pay raises) and came across a topic concerning minimum wage & whether it should be increased every four years. It wasn't until I started thinking about minimum wage that I realized what an interesting quagmire it presents. On one hand it is obvious that health care and energy costs have skyrocketed over the last few years, with even some increases in basic consumer goods and services, albeit not as substantial. These increases in turn make it harder for the lower wage earners to get by. However, it is common sense that when one raises the operating cost of a business, especially a small business, the employer must shift these costs on to the consumer in their prices. A rise in the prices of consumer goods and services is the basis of inflation, which one could debate that this country is on the verge of. Furthermore, many small businesses operate on a tight budget such that a minimum wage hike of 30-40% (I believe this is the proposed increase) could devastate many businesses.
How does one handle the issue of minimum wage? To grapple with this issue, the facts about who work minimum wage jobs need to be known, i.e. who and how many represent these minimum wage earners? Is it the neighbor’s kid who is just working after school and during summer to make a few extra bucks? Is it the single mom riding on the bus to her second job of the day in order to provide for her three children? I would be hard pressed to go against a minimum wage increase in the latter example as opposed to the former, in which the kid is receiving free rent and healthcare through their parents. However, if this example doesn’t characterize the majority than it would seem a minimum wage hike could hurt many at the expense of the few. I am also a firm believer that when it comes to opportunities in life, the lowest level attainable should not be worth hovering around. This drives people to go beyond complacency and to achieve goals otherwise not worth driving for. As we said on the fist day this blog was started, we hope to generate discourse and new ideas. The minimum wage fiasco is one of many topics that we would love to hear more feedback on.

Labels: ,

3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Or... do we even need a minimum wage anymore?

If we allow the market to "do its thing", then a person would earn what they are really worth, which could be a lot more, or a lot less.

The minimum wage was established to prevent exploitation. However, does anyone believe that there would be exploitation in today's litigious climate?

Of course, keep in mind that the minimum wage is tied distinctly to unions, who set their wages accordingly against that index. And we know how much power the unions have in Washington.

8/28/2006 6:23 PM  
Blogger HeadBangin' said...

Unions bring another sore subject to the forefront. In my opinion and from my experience, unions signify two points: one, they fight for what a good business or employer should already be doing, no union dues necessary. Two, they represent the laziness of working people. If a business is unsafe or has low wages, people should use their inherent power and voice the need for change or forgo working there. In its most simplistic form, a bad employer is only in business if they have employees working for them.
I use to work for a masonry restoration company and when we would work government jobs (i.e. post office), we had to be paid the prevailing wage between unions or our current wage. Our wage was always higher. Why? The employer was a smart business man: pay your employees well, especially your best employees, and you will be a good business.

Furthermore, anything that reduces political lobbying power in Washington is a good thing. If that means eradicating unions, I am all for it.

8/29/2006 7:06 AM  
Blogger rainy said...

According to 2005 data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics:

Of the 75.6 million Americans over 16yrs. who receive hourly wages, 1.88 million make minimum wage ($5.15) or less. Of these minimum wage earners, the teenage crowd (16-19) makes up 491,000, or about 26%.

Further statistics about this group of 1.88 million:
--1.3 million have a high school diploma or better
--744,000 are between 25 and 54 years old
--375,000 are between 25 and 54 years old, married with spouse present (presumably this mean that 369,000 are single income)
--about 2,000 have doctorate degrees

There seemed to be no data in the table I was looking at concerning percentage as head of household or number of dependents supported.
http://www.bls.gov/cps/minwage2005tbls.htm

All together the minumum wage earners only comprise about 2.5% of the hourly-waged work force.

9/19/2006 10:43 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

 
Who would you most like to buy a one-way ticket to another country for?
Cindy Sheehan
George Clooney
the Dixie chicks
Sean Penn
Michael Moore
barbara Streisand
  
Free polls from Pollhost.com